Coupling coefficient calculator, with the k-vs-gap curve.
Get k from two coils’ geometry — self-inductances and mutual inductance included — or from L1, L2 and M you already have.
Coupling coefficient calculator
- Coupling coefficient k
- 0.2809
- Mutual inductance M
- 6.754 µH
- Self-inductance L₁
- 24.04 µH
- Self-inductance L₂
- 24.04 µH
L uses the thin-wire formula with N² scaling (tightly bundled turns). M uses the exact Neumann integral for filament coils.
What is the coupling coefficient k?
The coupling coefficient k is the fraction of one coil’s magnetic flux that links the other, defined as k = M/√(L1·L2), and it always lies between 0 and 1. A value near 1 means almost all flux is shared, as in a transformer; wireless power links typically run from about 0.01 for loosely coupled resonant systems to around 0.5 for closely spaced charging pads. Because k sets how much power a link can transfer and how efficiently, it is the first number to check in any coil design. This calculator gives k two ways: from measured or simulated L1, L2 and M, or straight from coil geometry, computing both self-inductances with thin-wire formulas and the mutual inductance with the exact Neumann integral. The chart shows how quickly k falls as the gap grows. AirInduct Sim, the full simulator, extends this to spiral windings, misalignment sweeps and field maps.
How it's calculated
Mutual inductance M comes from the Neumann integral, exactly as in the mutual inductance calculator: Maxwell’s elliptic-integral formula for coaxial circles, an exact side-by-side integral for squares, and converged quadrature for offset or mixed pairs.
Self-inductance of each coil uses the standard thin-wire formulas for a loop of round wire (wire radius r_w), scaled by N² for a tightly bundled winding:
- These are the high-frequency forms (current on the wire surface). At DC, replace −2 with −1.75 and −0.774 with −0.524; the difference is a few percent.
- Valid when the loop is much larger than the wire (R ≳ 10 r_w); the calculator warns otherwise.
- Multi-turn coils are modelled as a tightly packed bundle: N² scaling with the winding’s geometric-mean radius (within ~4 % of a turn-by-turn sum). A spread-out planar spiral has lower L than this.
- The chart recomputes k over a range of gaps with your sizes, offset and wire.
Worked example
Two identical circular coils, radius 50 mm, 10 turns of 1 mm diameter wire (r_w = 0.5 mm), coaxial. Each coil has L = 24.04 µH. As the gap opens:
| 10 mm gap | M = 10.77 µH, k = 0.448 |
|---|---|
| 20 mm gap | M = 6.754 µH, k = 0.281 |
| 50 mm gap | M = 2.47 µH, k = 0.103 |
| 100 mm gap | M = 709.3 nH, k = 0.0295 |
Doubling the gap from 50 mm to 100 mm (one to two radii) cuts k by a factor of about three and a half, which is why coil size has to grow with transfer distance.
When you need the full simulator
This calculator is free to use and answers one question at a time. The full AirInduct Sim simulator takes the same physics further:
- Spiral (DTC) and Helmholtz windings with each turn at its true radius, so L and k reflect the real layout.
- Sweeps of k over gap and misalignment in one run, with the field plots behind each point.
- Q-factor, Litz-wire AC resistance and matching-network design from the same coil model.
- An optimizer that finds the geometry for a target k within your size limits.
More free calculators
- Mutual inductance calculatorM between two circular or square coils from turns, size, axial gap and lateral offset — or from k, L1 and L2.
- Helmholtz coil calculatorCentre field, required current and optimal spacing for circular and square Helmholtz pairs, with axial uniformity.
- Square Helmholtz coil calculatorSquare pairs at the 0.5445·a spacing: centre field, current for a target field and the uniform region.
- WPT compensation capacitor calculatorSeries–series and series–parallel resonant capacitors from L1, L2, M and frequency, with capacitor voltage stress.
- WPT efficiency calculatorMaximum link efficiency and figure of merit U = k√(Q1Q2), the optimal load and the k needed for a target η.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good coupling coefficient for wireless charging?
It depends on the gap. Phone-style chargers with a few millimetres of separation commonly reach roughly 0.3 to 0.7. EV pads across 100–250 mm of ground clearance usually sit around 0.1 to 0.3. Mid-range resonant links can work below 0.05, but only with high-Q coils. What matters for efficiency is the product k²Q1Q2 — see the WPT efficiency calculator.
Can the coupling coefficient be greater than 1?
No. Energy conservation requires M² ≤ L1·L2, so |k| ≤ 1. If measured values give k > 1, one of the inductances was usually measured at a different frequency, with a different fixture, or with the other coil open versus shorted. k can be negative, which only means the receiver is wound or placed so the linked flux is reversed.
Why does k not change when I change the number of turns?
For compact windings M scales with N1·N2 and each self-inductance with N², so the turns cancel in k = M/√(L1·L2). Turns change the impedance level and the voltages; the geometry — sizes, gap and alignment — sets the coupling. In real spiral coils the turns occupy different radii, so k does shift slightly; the full simulator models that.
How fast does k drop with distance?
For gaps much smaller than the coil size k falls gently. Once the gap is comparable to the coil radius it falls steeply, and far away it decays as the cube of distance, like two magnetic dipoles. As a rule of thumb, coil radius should be at least comparable to the transfer distance if you want k above about 0.1.
