Skip to content

Eight coil topologies, one solver

AirInduct Sim models wireless power transfer as a transmitter coil and a receiver coil. Each can be circular or square, and each can be a wound Helmholtz coil or a flat planar spiral (DTC) — eight pairs in all, compared below with numbers from the solver itself.

TxRx0125250375500x · mm|H| — BIOT-SAVARTMINMAX

Three choices make a topology

Outline. Circular coils are evaluated with complete elliptic integrals, and their coupling does not change when the device rotates about the shared axis. Square coils are built from straight segments using the exact Biot–Savart result for a finite wire; at the same half-dimension a square encloses about 27% more area than a circle, which raises mutual inductance.

Transmitter type and receiver type. A Helmholtz coil puts every turn at the full radius, so it links the most flux per turn but also carries the most self-inductance. A DTC, or descending-turn coil, is a planar spiral whose turns step inward by a fixed pitch; it is flat enough to print on a PCB, and its lower self-inductance often gives it a higher coupling coefficient. The direction matters for packaging, not for mutual inductance, which is reciprocal.

All eight pairs

Side-by-side comparison

Every row uses the same geometry: 5-turn transmitter and 5-turn receiver at 50 mm radius or half-side, 2 mm spiral pitch, coaxial, 1 A at 6.78 MHz. k is shown at 10 mm and 30 mm air gaps.

Comparison of the eight AirInduct Sim coil topologies
TopologyTransmitterReceiverTypical usek at 10 / 30 mmCoupling behaviour
Square Helmholtz Coil PairSquare Helmholtz (wound)Square Helmholtz (wound)Rectangular test rigs and fixtures0.369 / 0.165highest M of the eight
Circular Helmholtz Coil PairCircular Helmholtz (wound)Circular Helmholtz (wound)Calibration, teaching, benchmarking0.366 / 0.158closed-form, no grid
Circular Helmholtz-to-DTC Coil PairCircular Helmholtz (wound)Circular planar spiral (DTC)Thin tags, implants, smart cards0.389 / 0.172thin Rx, lower L_rx
Circular DTC-to-Helmholtz Coil PairCircular planar spiral (DTC)Circular Helmholtz (wound)Earbud, stylus and wearable pads0.390 / 0.172flat pad, wound device
Circular DTC-to-DTC Planar Coil PairCircular planar spiral (DTC)Circular planar spiral (DTC)Qi-style phone and watch charging0.461 / 0.197highest circular k
Square Helmholtz-to-DTC Coil PairSquare Helmholtz (wound)Square planar spiral (DTC)Rectangular docks with PCB receivers0.403 / 0.184thin Rx in a square bay
Square DTC-to-Helmholtz Coil PairSquare planar spiral (DTC)Square Helmholtz (wound)Worktop panels, tool and robot docks0.396 / 0.183flat Tx, wound Rx
Square DTC-to-DTC Planar Coil PairSquare planar spiral (DTC)Square planar spiral (DTC)Tablets, flat modules, PCB-to-PCB links0.465 / 0.207highest k of the eight

How to choose

Start from the mechanics. If one side must be flat — a pad under a surface, a PCB inside a phone or tablet — that side is a DTC spiral. If both must be flat, you are choosing between the circular and square DTC-to-DTC pairs, and the outline of the product usually decides it.

If you need a reference you can check by hand, use the circular Helmholtz coil pair, which AirInduct Sim solves in closed form. For rectangular rigs and bays, the square Helmholtz coil pair gives the highest mutual inductance of the eight (3.28 µH at 10 mm) even though its k is among the lowest.

Then check the gap. Across all eight pairs, k falls by 54–57% when the gap triples from 10 mm to 30 mm at this size, so the enclosure stack-up matters more than the choice between neighbouring topologies. Square outlines hold coupling slightly better with distance because they enclose more area.

Finally, remember that a higher k is not the whole story: link efficiency depends on k together with the quality factor of each coil, and printed spirals usually have more resistance than wound copper.

Quick calculators

Pick a topology and run your own geometry

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a Helmholtz coil and a DTC coil in AirInduct Sim?

A Helmholtz coil winds all of its turns at one radius or half-side, so every turn encloses the full area. A DTC (descending-turn coil) is a planar spiral: its turns step inward by a fixed pitch in a single plane, so it is flat enough to print on a PCB but has lower self-inductance for the same turn count.

Which coil topology has the highest coupling coefficient?

At the shared worked-example geometry — 50 mm half-dimension, five turns per side, 10 mm gap — square DTC-to-DTC is highest at k = 0.465, followed closely by circular DTC-to-DTC at 0.461. The Helmholtz pairs are lowest (about 0.37) because their wound turns carry more self-inductance.

Is a closed-form solver accurate enough to replace FEM for coil design?

For air-core coils in the magnetostatic regime — coils small relative to the wavelength, no ferrite or metal shielding in the field — the Biot–Savart and Neumann results are exact rather than approximate. Once ferrite sheets, shields or radiative effects dominate, a FEM or full-wave tool is the right instrument.